I went to the Philadelphia Orchestra again on Friday. On the program were two Mozart works - Serenade in D major (K 239) and Piano Concerto #25 - and Brahms' Symphony #1. While the Philadelphia Orchestra is a very good ensemble, their programming is not too adventurous. It seems like each concert features one very standard-rep warhorse (so far: Beethoven 3, Mendelssohn Violin Concerto, Brahms 1) and then something slightly less famous by another most-performed composer and/or the one of the most famous things by a slightly less-performed composer. Oregon Symphony is definitely better at programming works by living composers, as well as seldom-performed but high quality works by composers you thought you knew well. I'm not sure why this is, but my guess it that it has to do with the Oregon Symphony's and Philadelphia Orchestra's respective financial situations and audiences, both of which (I suspect) give the Oregon Symphony a little more room to take programming risks. Anyway, the warhorses do get excellent performances in Philly.
The Mozart Serenade was, to be honest, not the most interesting Mozart I've ever heard, and I'm a little embarrassed to say that I don't remember much about it. The soloist for the concerto was Emmanuel Ax. I expected him to be really good and he was. I was unfortunately not very focused in the first two movements - I was tired, and perhaps just not in the right mindset for Mozart - but I was rapt during the rondo. I've always loved rondos, and they tend to make me laugh at inappropriate times (such as when I am in a concert hall, or even when I am onstage playing the damn things). Ax played it with great sensitivity to its humorous potential, broadening the end of a phrase leading into the return of the rondo tune, hesitating a moment before launching back into the familiar material - I couldn't help it; I giggled, and the guy sitting next to me (another ezseatU kid) looked over. I think he smiled, though, so hopefully he wasn't thinking "How dare you giggle in this Temple of Art!" (I get a little paranoid.)
An interesting thing happened at intermission. I was whistling a bit of Brahms 1 as I was walking out of the hall, and then I stopped, and the guy sitting next to me (who was walking out behind me) took it up where I left off. Dear readers, I should have spoken to him. I am a fool.
So, Brahms. Brahms was great. I know more than one person who's really into Brahms but not that into his first symphony (bet one of them is reading this, you know who you are, hi!) but it might actually be my favorite, even if it's not the most distinctively "Brahmsian." And I think the Philadelphia Orchestra was born to play Brahms. I got a little sleepy during Mozart (shame on me!) and was worried that I would continue to be sleepy after intermission, but as soon as they started playing, I was completely swept up in the lush strings and rich woodwinds. These folks "get" romantic better than classical, I think (though maybe I'm projecting). All the solos were wonderful; oboe and violin in the second movement, clarinet in the third, and horn in the fourth all had beautiful tone and played flawlessly. The Brahms made the concert for me. Wish I could say more about it. I guess this is what I get for writing about it three days after it happened.
And now, for those of you based in or near Portland, I shall comment on the Oregon Symphony's 2012-2013 season (announced Saturday) and tell you that you should go to lots of concerts. (I, sadly, cannot.) There's a pretty good balance of stuff I know an love and stuff I've never heard before. I think I counted five living composers - could be better, but still better than Philly. Among the better-known things I really really wish I could be there for: Sibelius 5, Mahler 6, Copland 3, German Requiem, War Requiem (Yes, both! WANT), Tod und Verklärung, and Mozart's Piano Concerto #20. They've again saved their most interesting programming for Carnegie - Prangcharoen, Weill, Schoenberg, Schubert, Ravel, with Storm Large. See here for the complete season: http://tickets.orsymphony.org/auxiliary/AUXListing.aspx
In other news, I found a Chinese bakery four blocks from my house and have now gone there five days in a row because it is fantastic. This could become a problem.
Meaghan's Philadelphia Blog
Monday, February 27, 2012
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Bad Ideas: Governor's Budget
Part of my work entails being on conference calls and taking notes
for my supervisor when she is unable to be on the calls herself--such as
this past Thursday and Friday, when she had a speaking engagement at
Cornell. While I do little or no talking, I learn a lot on these calls.
The one on Thursday was about the criminalization of homelessness. The
one on Friday was about an impending crisis that, if not averted,
promises to drastically increase homelessness and other social
problems--Pennsylvania governor Tom Corbett's proposed budget.
So, here it is, folks--my blog is getting political!
The proposed budget features a number of austere (one might say draconian) cuts prompted by troubled economic times, but the one that has PPEHRC (and pretty much every other Pennsylvanian human services and/or social justice organization you can name) up in arms is the complete elimination of the General Assistance (GA) program. GA is the state's baseline cash assistance program for vulnerable Pennsylvanians with no other source of income. It pays $205 a month. To qualify, one must be disabled, a survivor of domestic violence, a caretaker of a disabled person, in an alcohol or drug treatment program, or a child living with an unrelated adult. A lot of these people will be pretty much screwed if they are simply cut off from assistance. Some examples:
Domestic violence survivors: Most of the ones on GA have just recently fled their abusers. Abusers, who often prevent women from going to school or working, are the sole source of income for many of these individuals. When survivors take the courageous step of leaving, GA is their lifeline while they work to get their lives back together and become independent. Without aid, leaving is often not a financially viable option, leading many women to stay with their abusers rather than take their chances with homelessness and destitution.
People in drug treatment and mental health programs: The cuts will lead to a number of programs being eliminated, with no provisions for where the people in them will go afterwards. One county commissioner says, “Literally, people could be turned out on the street. They could end up in prison or worse.”
Disabled people: In order to qualify for GA as a disabled person, you must be unable to work. This should be self-explanatory. They cannot earn money. Do they therefore lose the right to subsist? Just something to think about.
Multiple groups that have done cost benefit studies are stressing that the plan will cost much more money in the long run than it will save in the short run. As they are cut off by the state, greater numbers of people will turn to the already overwhelmed and underfunded shelter systems, counties, and churches. Higher incarceration rates are projected as well, and prisons are spendy. Keeping somebody behind bars costs a fair bit more than $205 a month. Prisons might get trickier to fund with the business tax cut that is also in the budget proposal.
Whenever politicians start talking about welfare reform, they hone in obsessively on people who "cheat the system" (by not reporting other sources of meager income, etc.). Reagan generated righteous anger on the part of the American public with an image he created of a woman on welfare with eighty aliases, collecting dozens of checks and driving Cadillacs--the Welfare Queen. It turned out Reagan had very lavishly embellished the news story of a woman with four aliases, accused of defrauding the state of $8,000. And she made the news because she was an anomaly. But the image stuck. The facts: people who are on cash assistance are desperately poor. Most people who are on cash assistance and have some other income that they do not report are also desperately poor. One cannot live in an American city on $205 a month, which is 25% of the federal poverty line.
I am of the opinion that even if welfare fraud were a common phenomenon, it would not justify cutting off aid to thousands of people in truly dire straits, for whom a monthly check can be the difference between barely getting by and not getting by. I leave you with this quote from Franklin Roosevelt's 1936 speech before the Democratic National Convention, which speech is an interesting piece of rhetoric not only because it illustrates a very different response to financial crisis, but also because it is indicative of views on economics and social responsibility that would mark Roosevelt as a radical today.
"Better the occasional faults of a government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."
And that's all for now.
Helpful links
Coalition to Save General Assistance: pacaresforall.org
FDR Speech: http://www.austincc.edu/lpatrick/his2341/fdr36acceptancespeech.htm
So, here it is, folks--my blog is getting political!
The proposed budget features a number of austere (one might say draconian) cuts prompted by troubled economic times, but the one that has PPEHRC (and pretty much every other Pennsylvanian human services and/or social justice organization you can name) up in arms is the complete elimination of the General Assistance (GA) program. GA is the state's baseline cash assistance program for vulnerable Pennsylvanians with no other source of income. It pays $205 a month. To qualify, one must be disabled, a survivor of domestic violence, a caretaker of a disabled person, in an alcohol or drug treatment program, or a child living with an unrelated adult. A lot of these people will be pretty much screwed if they are simply cut off from assistance. Some examples:
Domestic violence survivors: Most of the ones on GA have just recently fled their abusers. Abusers, who often prevent women from going to school or working, are the sole source of income for many of these individuals. When survivors take the courageous step of leaving, GA is their lifeline while they work to get their lives back together and become independent. Without aid, leaving is often not a financially viable option, leading many women to stay with their abusers rather than take their chances with homelessness and destitution.
People in drug treatment and mental health programs: The cuts will lead to a number of programs being eliminated, with no provisions for where the people in them will go afterwards. One county commissioner says, “Literally, people could be turned out on the street. They could end up in prison or worse.”
Disabled people: In order to qualify for GA as a disabled person, you must be unable to work. This should be self-explanatory. They cannot earn money. Do they therefore lose the right to subsist? Just something to think about.
Multiple groups that have done cost benefit studies are stressing that the plan will cost much more money in the long run than it will save in the short run. As they are cut off by the state, greater numbers of people will turn to the already overwhelmed and underfunded shelter systems, counties, and churches. Higher incarceration rates are projected as well, and prisons are spendy. Keeping somebody behind bars costs a fair bit more than $205 a month. Prisons might get trickier to fund with the business tax cut that is also in the budget proposal.
Whenever politicians start talking about welfare reform, they hone in obsessively on people who "cheat the system" (by not reporting other sources of meager income, etc.). Reagan generated righteous anger on the part of the American public with an image he created of a woman on welfare with eighty aliases, collecting dozens of checks and driving Cadillacs--the Welfare Queen. It turned out Reagan had very lavishly embellished the news story of a woman with four aliases, accused of defrauding the state of $8,000. And she made the news because she was an anomaly. But the image stuck. The facts: people who are on cash assistance are desperately poor. Most people who are on cash assistance and have some other income that they do not report are also desperately poor. One cannot live in an American city on $205 a month, which is 25% of the federal poverty line.
I am of the opinion that even if welfare fraud were a common phenomenon, it would not justify cutting off aid to thousands of people in truly dire straits, for whom a monthly check can be the difference between barely getting by and not getting by. I leave you with this quote from Franklin Roosevelt's 1936 speech before the Democratic National Convention, which speech is an interesting piece of rhetoric not only because it illustrates a very different response to financial crisis, but also because it is indicative of views on economics and social responsibility that would mark Roosevelt as a radical today.
"Better the occasional faults of a government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."
And that's all for now.
Helpful links
Coalition to Save General Assistance: pacaresforall.org
FDR Speech: http://www.austincc.edu/lpatrick/his2341/fdr36acceptancespeech.htm
Friday, February 10, 2012
Philadelphia Orchestra Concert
I went to my second Philadelphia Orchestra concert today. I
have access to unlimited concerts for a year, having paid $25 for the college
student ticket program (“ezseatU”), which is a great deal. This afternoon, I hurried back from a field trip,
printed my ticket, and arrived at Verizon Hall maybe ten or fifteen minutes
before the start of the performance. The ezseatU kids gather in one area of the
lobby and have to wait there until right before the concert begins, when an
usher leads us all in like ducklings and puts us in whichever seats nobody
bought. Both times I’ve gone, standing in the midst of the other college
students has made me feel like I’m back in the Whitman music building, which is
both comforting and a bit of a homesickness trigger. Nerdy-looking young
adults, some of whom carry instrument cases, discuss harmonic novelties in
Beethoven, make terrible music puns, and complain about orchestration homework.
(If you’re reading this, current and former denizens of the music library, I
miss you!)
I had a good seat this time. I was fairly close and had a
clear view of the soloists. The program was Frank Martin’s Concerto for Seven
Winds, Percussion, and String Orchestra; the Mendelssohn Violin Concerto; and
the Bartók Concerto for Orchestra. The Martin had a little group of wind and
brass soloists (flute, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, horn, trumpet, trombone) seated
at the front of the orchestra and they were brilliant. They had some dazzlingly
virtuosic solos in the outer movements which rolled out from under their
fingers like they were nothing. My favorite movement, though, was the second. In
the beginning, the violins play the fragmentary first theme over a persistent
minor third ostinato and then the winds eventually pick up the theme in turns
and give it very different treatments. It becomes dreamy and lyrical when the flute
takes it, and militant when it belongs to the trumpet, while still sounding
like part of the same theme. The relentless ostinato can be heard through most
of the movement, storming all over the melody at times only to recede politely
into the background a moment later. The program notes say it “might suggest a
slow march or the inexorable flow of time.”
I wasn’t terribly excited about the Mendelssohn because I am
so familiar with it, but this was a really good performance. I had heard it in
concert once before, with Joshua Bell and the Oregon Symphony, and that time I had been looking forward to it, but everybody
coughed the whole time. Also, tangent: I don’t love Joshua Bell, and the
reasons have—perhaps unfairly—little to do with how he actually sounds. Yes, very
good violinist. Okay. It’s just all those posters of him playing with his hair
all over the place and the halo of flying sweat droplets, and that look on his
face like he’s being tortured. And the album covers where he’s reclining on a
mahogany sofa surrounded by candles or some similar nonsense. It’s probably not
his fault. Anyway, I liked this soloist, James Ehnes. He came onstage wearing a
black suit and red necktie and it took me a moment to realize he was, in fact,
the soloist because he looked like a rather diminutive businessman. But, my
goodness, could that man ever play the violin! He seemed to vary his timbre
with the character of the music. In the cadenza, his tone was bright and clear
and sounded to me like it should have been produced by an instrument made of
crystal. In the B theme, it was warm and rich and matched perfectly with the
orchestra. (The Philadelphia Orchestra is known for having a “warm” sound. I
can’t really describe what constitutes a warm sound, but I feel like I
recognize it, and at the same times as other people.) And I love that theme
anyway. My favorite moments in Mendelssohn are the ones with an “It’ll be all
right, child” air to them, like this and the “lovers going to sleep” parts of
the Midsummer Night’s Dream Overture.
The Bartók was another piece I knew, though I hadn’t heard
it for a while and had forgotten how much I like it. The first two movements
are not my favorites, though the second movement “game of pairs” is
conceptually interesting and has awesome creaky bassoon solos. The third
movement is creepy and desolate and the clarinetist and flutist really played
up the “creepy” aspect. The fourth movement has to be my favorite, the way it
alternates between serious sections with long, legato melodies in the strings
and moments that are just plain silly,
like the accelerating clarinet march or the deep, quasi-flatulent tuba honks.
And then in the final movement, Bartók flirts with the idea of straightforward
major tonality but, from the opening horn solo on, keeps throwing in out-of-key
notes or surprising modulations… until
you get used to him doing so, whereupon the music becomes (for a time)
relatively harmonically static and uncomplicatedly sunny. And when you get used
to that, it’s back to Bartókian harmonies again. It was fun. And also had fugues. Yay!
So, that was my concert. It’s harder to write about music
when I don’t have an assignment to write about it from a particular angle. But
anyway, I enjoyed the performance very much! If you ever spend a term or more
in Philadelphia during your college career, do invest in their student ticket program.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Internship
Today was the third day of my internship. I am working at
the Poor People's Economic Human Rights Campaign, a grassroots social movement
organization that fights poverty and social injustice on a number of fronts,
both locally in Philadelphia and working with other organizations on a national
scale. To quote the mission statement, PPEHRC is “committed to uniting the
poor across color lines as the leadership base for a broad movement to abolish
poverty. We work to accomplish this through advancing economic human rights as
named in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, such as the rights to food,
housing, health, education, communication, and a living wage job.” The
organization operates on the principle that social movements should be led by
the people most affected by the issues they are addressing, and in accordance
with that, PPEHRC’s leadership is made up of people living below the federal
poverty level. Some areas where
PPERHC is active include:
·
Food
Distributions – PPEHRC talks to grocery stores and food banks, gets lots of
donations, and goes door-to-door delivering them to people.
·
Housing
Takeovers – Philadelphia has ten times as many homeless people as shelter
beds, and it has twice as many empty houses as homeless people. The process of
acquiring subsidized housing if you are homeless takes forever, and there are
numerous obstacles along the way. PPEHRC reclaims abandoned houses and puts
homeless families in them in a hurry, then works on acquiring the legal rights
to houses for the families.
·
Reclaiming
Vacant Land – Besides just empty buildings, Philadelphia has thousands and
thousands of empty lots, ugly “urban prairies,” so to speak, mostly in poor
neighborhoods. These lots often stay undeveloped for years and discourage
investment in the areas where they are located. Residents want to use them for
community gardens or sites for affordable housing, but do not have the legal
right to use the land. PPEHRC is working with a number of other organizations
to help design legislation to create a Community Land Trust that would make it
easier for community members to gain access to abandoned land, revitalizing
neighborhoods and putting residents in control. PPEHRC is also currently
working on an urban cooperative farm on what was a large abandoned lot.
·
World
Courts on Poverty in the US – The World Courts are assemblies (not actual
courts of law) that take testimony from everyday people to expose human rights
violations and then present their findings to the UN Human Rights Council.
There are four big ones taking place across the country this spring and
Philadelphia is hosting one.
·
Organizing
Marches and Protests – PPEHRC is currently working on plans for the March
for Our Lives, which happens at the Republican National Convention every election
year and usually a pretty enormous gathering.
·
Camps for
Kids – PPEHRC organizes summer camps for children in poor neighborhoods
with a variety of activities. They get free passes for the kids to many places
around the city that charge admission, like the aquarium.
·
Connecting
with Artists – Art Feeds Us is a PPEHRC program that connects local artists
(visual artists, musicians, writers, etc.) with the movement.
·
Fighting
the Marginalization and Invisibility of the Poor and the Homeless – Whenever
there is a proposal to build affordable housing in Philadelphia, there is a
great deal of resistance to it – nobody wants it where they are. PPEHRC supports proposals for affordable housing. Cheri Honkala,
the director, also has a history of organizing tent cities designed not only to
fight the isolation often experienced by homeless people, but also to (very
successfully) draw media and public attention to issues of homelessness.
·
Political
Education – PPEHRC is constantly working on getting people affected by
poverty involved and informed.
PPEHRC uses a few rooms in the Norris Square Civic
Association building. When I go to work, it’s usually just a few people sitting
in either the computer room or the office working on a million different things
at once and somehow making so much happen. Today I made phone calls and sent
emails to people about the planning meeting that is happening on Monday for the
World Court, I researched a grant foundation and the Community Land Trust
project and began writing a grant, and I connected with the director of Art
Feeds Us in preparation to help locate more artists. Cheri, my supervisor, is amazing. She is brave and tireless and I think she knows everything. I am glad to be working here.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
I have an apartment!
I arrived at The Philadelphia Center on Sunday afternoon. There are 48 students on the program and we are currently staying in a hotel, four people to a room. Yesterday we went on a four-hour walking tour of the city. When we set out, it was 19 degrees Fahrenheit; as the day went on it became somewhat less frigid but the temperature stayed below freezing. In the evening, we were all given a list of houses and apartments where TPC students have lived in the past, and the housing search began. Choosing people with whom to live for a semester after having known them for only 1-2 days seemed very daunting to me, but it has worked out. I have four new housemates whom I like very much, and after pounding the pavement all day (we visited five different places all over the city, and did it all on foot, half the time in pouring rain), we have a place to live! We will move in at the end of the week.
I also have classes now. One is "Urban Political and Social Systems, Issues and Practices" and the other is "Exploring Relationships in Fiction and Film: Sex, Gender and Sexuality." I'm excited about both of these. Now I get to start looking for an internship! Details on that to come. And hopefully once I am settled in to my apartment I will have time to write longer posts that are actually about the city and not just about what I am doing!
I also have classes now. One is "Urban Political and Social Systems, Issues and Practices" and the other is "Exploring Relationships in Fiction and Film: Sex, Gender and Sexuality." I'm excited about both of these. Now I get to start looking for an internship! Details on that to come. And hopefully once I am settled in to my apartment I will have time to write longer posts that are actually about the city and not just about what I am doing!
Saturday, January 14, 2012
Flash mobs, pierogi, and "Soundsuits" (Day 2)
Just as in Portland, downtown is populated with pigeons and sparrows. The only difference between the urban birds here and back home is that Philly's are completely fearless.
| Had I been devoid of conscience, I could have stepped on this sparrow. |
| Those are more pipes in the top enclave. |
After we left the flash mob, we went to Reading Terminal Market, a big public market housed in what used to be a train shed. That was where we got lunch. I had pierogi--delicious, doughy little Polish dumplings I had never encountered before. The last picture I took before my camera battery died gives you an idea how crowded the market is. My cousins say it's much more crowded on weekdays.
Then we went to a gallery called the Fabric Workshop where we saw the strange and wonderful "Soundsuits" of Nick Cave.
We went into a room and there were a bunch of these standing around on neutrally posed mannequins. They were a little eerie at first, but fascinating and beautiful. They were made to be worn by dancers, and we did get to see a video of the suits in motion, which was pretty cool.
In other news, Frankie the dog is very expressive. When he worries his squeaky toy, he squeaks along with it. As soon as I took out my camera to capture the moment, he stopped. But I am determined to get a video of it eventually! Also, I was playing a bit of Beethoven on the piano today, and when I reached a particularly poignant suspension, he threw back his head and howled. It reminded me of my old piano teacher's dog who used to make mournful Wookiee noises when I played pieces in minor keys. I hope Frankie was indeed reacting to the music. I will leave you with this rather whimsical quote from Erik Satie, which is one of my favorite things a composer has ever said: "We cannot doubt that animals both love and practice music. That is evident. But it seems their musical system differs from ours. It is another school... We are not familiar with their didactic works. Perhaps they don't have any."
Oh, and I start at The Philadelphia Center tomorrow!
Friday, January 13, 2012
And here I am!
If you are reading this blog, you probably know me and have at least a rough idea what I am doing in Philadelphia. But, to explain briefly:
Many Whitman students do one semester of off-campus study in their junior year. Most of these go to other countries, but some choose domestic programs. I am spending my spring semester on a program called The Philadelphia Center (see tpc.edu for more details than I'm about to give you). The program is internship-based and helps students find internships in pretty much any field you can think of. The internship hunting begins after arrival in Philadelphia, so I do not yet know where I will be spending the semester. Students also take classes at the Center one day a week. Housing is "independent city living"--one spends one's first week in Philadelphia finding roommates (other kids on the program) and then a place to live.
So--ready, set, go! The program starts on Sunday, but I am in Philadelphia now, staying with very kind cousins. My cousin Margie and her son Brian picked me up at the airport and we drove through Center City on our way home. And, though it was dark, I discovered that Philadelphia is beautiful. There are so many places I want to visit, so many concerts I want to attend, so much I want to learn! (The first thing I learned was how to say "Schuylkill River." I almost have it.)
So, I'm tired, and I'm gushing. Future blog posts will be more interesting, hopefully. I will be able to talk about where I'm working, experiences of living in the big city, concerts, potentially controversial matters, etc. Perhaps I will periodically subject you to poetry I like (but nothing by me; don't worry!), or art. Anyway, for all I've already seen of Scenic Philadelphia, all I've photographed so far is this adorable dog belonging to my cousin Mary and her husband Dennis. So here is Frankie.
Many Whitman students do one semester of off-campus study in their junior year. Most of these go to other countries, but some choose domestic programs. I am spending my spring semester on a program called The Philadelphia Center (see tpc.edu for more details than I'm about to give you). The program is internship-based and helps students find internships in pretty much any field you can think of. The internship hunting begins after arrival in Philadelphia, so I do not yet know where I will be spending the semester. Students also take classes at the Center one day a week. Housing is "independent city living"--one spends one's first week in Philadelphia finding roommates (other kids on the program) and then a place to live.
So--ready, set, go! The program starts on Sunday, but I am in Philadelphia now, staying with very kind cousins. My cousin Margie and her son Brian picked me up at the airport and we drove through Center City on our way home. And, though it was dark, I discovered that Philadelphia is beautiful. There are so many places I want to visit, so many concerts I want to attend, so much I want to learn! (The first thing I learned was how to say "Schuylkill River." I almost have it.)
So, I'm tired, and I'm gushing. Future blog posts will be more interesting, hopefully. I will be able to talk about where I'm working, experiences of living in the big city, concerts, potentially controversial matters, etc. Perhaps I will periodically subject you to poetry I like (but nothing by me; don't worry!), or art. Anyway, for all I've already seen of Scenic Philadelphia, all I've photographed so far is this adorable dog belonging to my cousin Mary and her husband Dennis. So here is Frankie.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

